About Me

Name: lobo1776
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

23 ways to be a good Democrat

Many thanks to Mrs. Lobo for sending this to me.  I dont care who you are this is funny.  In fact, you'd have to be the love-child of Nancy Pelosi not to think these are funny.  

  So enjoy!!!!!!:

23 Ways to be a good Democrat:

1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.

2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.

3. You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the hands of Chinese and North Korean communists.

4. You have to believe that there was no art before Federal funding.

5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by cyclical documented changes in the earth's climate and more affected by soccer moms driving SUV's.

6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial but being homosexual is natural.

7. You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding.

8. You have to believe that the same teacher who can't teach 4th-graders how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about sex.

9. You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but loony activists who have never been outside of San Francisco do.

10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing something to earn it.

11. You have to believe that Mel Gibson spent $25 million of his own money to make The Passion of the Christ for financial gain only.

12. You have to believe the NRA is bad because it supports certain parts of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good because it supports certain parts of the Constitution.

13. You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too high.

14. You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinem are more important to American history than Thomas Jefferson, Gen. Robert E. Lee, and Thomas Edison & A.G. Bell.

15. You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides are not.

16. You have to believe that Hillary Clinton is normal and is a very nice person.

17. You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried is because the right people haven't been in charge.

18. You have to believe conservatives telling the truth belong in jail, but a liar and a sex offender belonged in the White House.

19. You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag, transvestites, and bestiality should be constitutionally protected, and manger scenes at Christmas should be illegal.

20. You have to believe that illegal Democratic Party funding by the Chinese Government is somehow in the best interest to the United States.

21. You have to believe that this message is a part of a vast, right wing conspiracy.

22. You have to believe that it's okay to give Federal workers off on Christmas Day but it's not okay to say "Merry Christmas."

23). You have to get elected on a platform of cleaning out corruption in government while appointing criminals and felons to Committee Chairmanships.


See, told you they was priceless.  I'm sure that there are a lot more we will be coming up with in the next two years!!!!


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The US---The Democrats Vietnam?

 

No, you're not seeing things. The idea of the US being the Democratic party's Vietnam is not far fetched.  Especially now that the party has re-adopted the concept of "Cut and Run".

 Consider this: In 1965, Lyndon Johnson sent the first of 200,000 combat troops into Vietnam. He is convinced by his advisors that the war is winnable. Two years later, in 1967, Robert MacNamara appears before the Senate Subcommitte and declares the bombing of North Vietnam has had no effect on the North's ability to wage war against the US. MacNamara reverses his earlier opinion of the war and now suggests the US pull out of its involvement in Vietnam. In Feb. of 1968, after the Tet offensive, part-time newscaster and part-time foreign policy maker Walter Cronkite declares on his evening broadcast on CBS:"But it is increasingly clear to this reporter that the only rational way out then will be to negotiate, not as victors, but as an honorable people who lived up to their pledge to defend democracy, and did the best they could." Immediately afterwards, every Democrat in Congress learns to say a new word:"Dove". The biggest is Eugene MacCarthy who out does President Johnson in the New Hampshire primary. Shortly afterwards, Johnson does his own version of cut-and-run by deciding not to run for President in 1968. Richard Nixon is elected in 1968 on a platform of ending the war as "Peace with Honor". The Democrat-controlled Congress insists on "Peace at any Price". Nixon prevails however and the US involvement in Vietnam ends in 1973. Unfortuneatly, Nixon's involvement in the US Presidency ends in 1974. In 1975 North Vietnam begins the final assault on the South realizing the US will not help. Gerald Ford, under pressure from, again, the Democratic controlled congress announces:"that as far as the U.S. is concerned, the Vietnam War is "finished."

I know it was a bit of the abridged history of the Vietnam War, but the point needs to be made. Every time the US has gone to war for more than a week, the Democrats immediately raise the specter of the Vietnam War and insist we need to pull out. There is no evidence to support that Pelosi and her gang will not do the same if they are empowered on Tuesday. On Wednesday morning House Majority Leader Pelosi will announce that the war on terror is unwinnable and we need to cut our losses and run. President Bush will be forced to withdraw troops from Iraq, leaving the terrorists to re-take Iraq. The Democrats will re-label the terrorists as "freedom-fighters" and vote to send them millions of US tax dollars in foreign aid.(Not really, I just made that part up. On the other hand , tho, you never know)

Laughable? How about these facts: First about Pelosi and her voting record on the war on terror.( Oops sorry, I forgot she doesnt believe we are at war)"Pelosi voted repeatedly against the counterterrorism Patriot Act, opposed creation of the Department of Homeland Security and voted against a resolution condemning the leak of the National Security Agency's highly classified program for monitoring terrorist communications. Pelosi also reportedly told colleagues that she would appoint as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee overseeing America's counterterrorism efforts Rep. Alcee Hastings, an ultra-liberal and at least formerly sleazy Florida Democrat. Hastings was impeached and removed as a federal judge by a Democratic-controlled Congress in 1988-89 on bribery and obstruction of justice charges." (San Diego Union-Tribune, 6 Nov, 2006) and "House Democrats have voted, often by overwhelming margins, against nearly all the pillars of the Bush administration's counterterrorism policy and programs. A majority of House Democrats voted repeatedly against the Patriot Act, against authorizing military tribunals for captured terrorists, against modernizing electronic surveillance legislation to permit monitoring of terrorists by the National Security Agency and against creation of the Department of Homeland Security. and "Twice in the 1990s and twice more since the terrorist attacks in 2001, half or more of House Democrats voted to cut finding for U.S. intelligence agencies. This year, 93 House Democrats voted against the 2007 Defense Authorization bill, which included appropriations for the major U.S. intelligence agencies. "(The San Diego Union-Tribune, 6 Nov 2006)

Why should the Pelosi gang stop there? The policy of "Cut and Run" could also be applied to the economy. Democratic control of the House would mean Pelosi would make New York Democrat Rep. Charles Rangel chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee. Rangel says he would oppose extending any of the Bush tax cuts past their expiration in 2010 – imposing a huge tax increase on an economy fueled by Bush's first-term tax reductions. In otherwords, he would "Cut and Run" on the growing economy we have now in favor of doubling and tripling taxes in 2010. As always the middle class would bear the biggest part of the tax increases but that wouldnt matter to the Democrats. As long as their precious entitlement programs are safe, who cares who has to pay.

Pick a subject, any subject, and I can give you examples on how the Democrats have practiced "Cut and Run". Immigration? The Democratic Party obviously believes we can't win the battle of illegal immigrants. Thats why more than half of the Democrats in the House voted against the 700 mile fence between the US and Mexico and also voted against increasing the size of the Border Patrol. Family values? Ok lets be honest the Democratic Party "Cut and Run" years ago from family values. Their support of abortion, embryonic stem-cell research and their flip-flop on the question of same-sex marriages proves that. Throw into that mixture their lack of support for the "No Child left Behind" Act, because the NEA told them not to support it, and the issue of family values is dead in the Pelosi party.

The clock is starting to tick. We have some clear choices to make when the sun rises. Do we continue to "Stay the Course" or do we bow to the pressure of the liberals and "Cut and Run". In a strange way it reminds me of the situation faced by the men in the Alamo. I know is warped but follow my logic. You had 188 men against an army of over 7000. The situation was hopeless and they knew it. They could have "Cut and Run", i.e., surrendered but they knew in doing so they would be surrendering not only Texas but the future of their children as well. So they chose to "Stay the Course" even tho it meant sacrificing their lives.

If we "Cut and Run" now will we also not be surrendering the future of our children as well....think about it!

 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WORLD ENDS AT 10:00..Film at 11:00

 

  Aww the mainstream media....you really got to love them. With their total insistence that "the cornerstone of a free democratic society is a free media" ,their constant hiding behind the First Amendment, and their eliteist attitude, they do make life in this country very interesting. We can sit here all nite and list the lies and distortion of facts that make up "responsible journalism" in the mainstream media, but, instead, I listed the most significant. So get out your Jason Bryer pens and your Stephen Glass notebooks and get ready for a bumpy ride through the world of "journalistic integrity". See why those two words are a bigger oxymoron than "military intelligence".....

  Take Tuesday's elections for example. Last week the msm (main stream media) had the Democrats winning the House and making significant gains in the Senate by a landslide margin. Now, following on the heels of the Kerry gaffe and the NY Times report that Sadaam Insane was a year away from having a nuclear bomb, nothing is certain anymore. Oh they are still trying to keep a stiff upper-lip, or maybe a stiff upper keyboard, but their reporting is now shaky, at best. If the truth be known, I think they sound alittle bit nervous about tomorrow's outlook. What if they are wrong? What if they, again, misinterpreted the American electorate?

  For the MSM being wrong is nothing new. Take the last three elections. In 2000 they tried to call the election for Al B.Gore before all the votes were in. Then with egg on their faces, they had to declare that the election was still up for grabs. After all that work they did trying to get Al Gore elected, too. Who could forget the campaign stop in Iowa with Al Gore and the poor, sweet, little old lady who had to collect tin cans to pay for her medications.  MSM response was swift and predictable.  Akin to their annunciation in 1994 that a Republican Congress would cause the death of children and old folks, they again described in lurid detail how Mr. Bush's tax cuts would destroy the elderly.  What a shame when we found out that the little ol lady had a wealthy son who told the country that he had offered on many occasions to pay for his mother's meds but she refused!

  In 2002, they predicted the Democrats would keep control of the senate and Tom Dashle would stay Senate Majority Leader. So where's ol Tom today? Cooling his heels in South Dakota, while his party is still the minority in the Senate.

  In 2004 the msm went into hyper-overdrive. We all remember what happened. The love affair with Howard Dean, until he went ballistic at a campaign rally, then they fell in love with John Kerry, trying to anoint him as the reincarnation of John Kennedy. It was so bad in fact, that, two days after he was elected at the Democratic National Convention, the msm went out and bought millions of bottles of Heinz Ketchup, just to show they cared.  Then there was the way they purposely ignored the allegations by the Swift Boat Captains about Kerry's military record while Dan Rather and CBS gleefully produced erroneous documents about Bush's military record. Heck, it didnt take a rocket scientist to see that those documents were produced on a PC using WordPerfect. Only a bunch of non-journalistic bloggers on the Internet. You remember the Internet, thats the thing Al Gore invented.

  They continue today with their slanted and biased reporting on the War on Terrorism and in particular, the war in Iraq. They continue to ignore the progress made in Iraq and the Iraqi people's steady march to democracy. Cindy Sheehan and her anti-war group are the new heroes of the Republic. Lost in all the anti-Bush rhetoric is the positive economy, gas prices falling, Dow Jones hitting new heights, and, most important, America is safer than it was 10 years ago. More importantly, lost in all the rhetoric is the fact the Democrats have no policies or plans to keep another 9/11 from happening, again.   All they want to do is win, then they'll figure out what to do.  Sleep well tonite knowing that!!!!

  I guess I can understand why they do what they do, tho. The MSM is stuck in a sixties time warp, just like John Kerry. They wander around DC looking under every rock trying to find the smoking gun like Woodward and Bernstein did. They get themselves embedded with US troops so they can find those My Lai massacres and attrocities that supposedly happened in Vietnam. These are the things that Pulitzer Prizes and ratings sweeps are made of.  I guess it must be the instant gratification that a couple of million people believe the lies you tell and are now gonna make you a rich person that drives them.  Sure couldn't be their pursuit of the truth.
  
   I do wonder one thing tho. The main stream media has called it wrong three elections in a row. Is it possible that the American electorate listens to what the media says it outa do, then goes out and does the exact opposite? If that be the case, then the Democrats have set themselves up for one major let-down tomorrow.

   If that happens, it'll be interesting to see how the media spins another Democratic loss.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Quiet end of a noisy week

Just sitting here in the cave taking a breather from what was a wild and crazy week.... 

  It all started out with John Kerry's revelation on Monday that our military troops are "uneducated" and "stuck" in Iraq rather than being at home and marrying wealthy women.  We've had alot of fun with ol' John and his snooty elitist uber-Democrat friends.   And of course we were told by the same uber-Democrat MSM (that means main stream media for our uneducated men and women in the military, stuck in Iraq) that it was simply a joke that didnt work.  He obviously was "referring to Bush".  Ok if thats the case why were future Democratic presidential hopefulls like Iron Thighs Hillary Clinton trying so hard to distance themselves from Kerry.  Cuz ah , they knew what he really meant too....maybe.

  Then Friday we get the news item from the New York Times.  The Times, in an obvious Bush bashing attempt, tells the story of a web site run by the government which lists seized detailed Iraqi documents which , besides having Saadams grocery list, also contains documents detailing Iraqi nuclear power research.  The big news: Iraq was only a year away in 2002 from having a nuclear bomb.  You can read the whole article at this link: www.nytimes.com 
The article goes into great lengths talking about how shocked European diplomats and members of the International Atomic Energy agency that these documents were even allowed to be seen.  Another shocked individual was, A. Bryan Siebert, a former director of classification at the federal Department of Energy, who said: For the U.S. to toss a match into this flammable area is very irresponsible

  Read the entire report because there is an idea in there many people will miss.  Especially those liberals who keep mantraing "Bush lied and they died".  On a side note isnt it funny that they always say 'and they died" and not "our troops died", or "our folks in uniform" died?  What it said was that there is evidence that Saadam not only had chemical and biological WMDs but "Mr. Hussein’s scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away".  Guess maybe GW wasnt too far off then.

  In reading this article I get the feeling that the  NY TImes seemed shocked too.  Maybe not so much in the content of the disclosed documents but in the fact the White House had the audacity to leak something on the Internet.  Gasp!! Shock!! And in horror!!  Nobody but the main stream media is EVER allowed to leak anything to the American people.  How dare Bush usurp their authority!!!.  This is an outrage, blasphemy I tell you!!

  Im sure that both these items wont have alot of effect on the election.  The msm pretty well declared Kerry's gaffe a dead issue after Kerry gave what can be laughingly called "an apology".  And I'd be willing to bet my cave that the NY Times article will get no msm air time.  Cant have the truth come out just before the elections now can we?  Only the lies can come out, never the truth.

  Well gotta keep this one alittle short.  Daylite comes early here in the cave and us old dogs need our beauty sleep.  Gotta get up early and starting makin those phone calls to get out the vote!!!!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just a few quick notes---Nov.3, 2006

 

Just a few thoughts from the Wolf Den.....

1). I'm sure that all the panty waisted liberals would like this Kerry thing to go away so being a good little wolf, I wont let it!!!!  As our brave men and women fight to protect us from terrorism, its important for us to remember who isnt supporting them and who just dont get it......

Here some quotes that should warm your heart:

"I am writing too in the hope that my telling this one story will help you to understand more clearly how so many fine people have come to find themselves still loving their country but loathing the military, to which you and other good men have devoted years, lifetimes, of the best service you could give." Bill Clinton's draft letter, Dec. 3rd, 1969

"I don't really consider ourselves at war," Nancy Pelosi

"American troops...had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam..." and (had)committed warcrimes "on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command." John Kerry testifying to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, April 22, 1971

"After being blocked from holding a ceremony honoring the war dead at Arlington National Cemetery, the veterans marched to the Capitol to present sixteen demands to Congress...the soldiers began flinging their war medals over a high wire fence in front of the Capitol: Purple Hearts, Bronze Star Medals, Silver Stars -- bits of ribbon and metal hurled in the face of the government that had so betrayed them...One of them was John Kerry, Vietnam Navy veteran and aspiring politician who had been among those who organized the protest. Kerry flung a handful of medals -- he had received the Silver Star, a Bronze Star Medal, and three Purple Hearts -- over the fence..But years later, after his election to the Senate, Kerry's medals turned up on the wall of his Capitol Hill office. When a reporter noticed them, Kerry admitted that the medals he had thrown that day were not his....excerpts from"Stolen Valor: How the Vietnam Generation Was Robbed of its Heroes and its History" pg. 130-137

Now for the kicker!!! And this aint no bull. This info is taken from www.wintersoldier.com

"
Communist Vietnamese honor John Kerry, the war protestor, as a hero in their victory over the United States in the Vietnam War.

In the Vietnamese Communist War Remnants Museum (formerly known as the "War Crimes Museum") in Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon), a photograph of John Kerry hangs in a room dedicated to the anti-war activists who helped the Vietnamese Communists win the Vietnam War. The photograph shows Senator Kerry being greeted by the General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam, Comrade Do Muoi.

  The date of the photo in question is somewhere between July 15-18 1993 . Of course this was brought out during the 2004 campaign by the Swift Boat Veterans, but it bears seeing again. Just in case someone REALLY thinks ol John was talking about GW on 30 Oct., 2006. I also added the rest of those quotes just so you know what the Democrats REALLY think of our military folks and our war on terrorism. Scary, aint it???  Ok if that dont scare you think about this: Nancy Pelosi, two heart-beats away from the Presidency.  And if that STILL dont scare you, than just look at a photo of her.  That would scare anyone!!!!

  2).  To all my conservative Republican friends. Yeah you know who you are. Your either not gonna vote or not vote Republican on Nov. 7 to protest what has passed for Republicanism over these past 8 years. Ok so your mad at the growth of government, your mad at the high deficit, or your mad, like me, at the Republican leadership for being Democrats in Republican suits or for whatever reason, now is NOT the time to jump ship. Look at it logically. You could either vote Republican, and sleep safe and sound, or vote Democrat and worry about your safety.  And lets not lull ourselves into some false security that if we let 'em win now, we'll get 'em in 2008.  The McCain-Feingold campaign reform act pretty well insured that incumbents will always get re-elected.  So if the Democrats take control on Nov. 7, they'll stay in control for a looong time.  Not only because of campaign reform but also, remember, they are the media darlings. 

  So I know what I'm gonna do. I'm voting for the guys with the proven track record in fighting terrorism: the Republicans. God willing and they stay in control, Im gonna spend the next two years here bloggin away, trying to get the Party back on track. God forbid if they lose and Pelosi and her gang take over, well, you know, those caves in Tora Bora might actually be safer than the US.

 3).).  Speaking of the Republican Party, heres a subliminal message from me to them: Think Rick Santorum for President.  Thats right, you heard me.  Rick Santorum.  And why not?  Who else do we have?  Newt Gingrich....damaged goods.  Sorry, but this election will mean to much to run someone thats good fodder for the media.  John McCain....nope, not a Reagan Republican.  He does have good war credentials tho. 

  Nope Rick Santorum would be my choice for moving the Republican Party back to its roots and back to the ideals and principles so eloquently stated by the late President Ronald Reagan.  Catch this op-ed piece he wrote for Townhall.com in Nov. 2005:

What I call "Compassionate Conservatism" has something unique to offer to the shaping of our future.

Compassionate Conservatism relies on healthy families, freedom of faith, a vibrant civil society, a proper understanding of the individual and a focused government to achieve noble purposes through definable objectives which offers hope to all. [...]

Conservatism is based upon the idea of preserving the good in our society, adding to it the wisdom of experience coupled with the courage and optimism of a new generation. This formula inspired Reagan and Thatcher to hope, and to work together to change the world. Let us build upon their example to be a beacon of hope in this troubled world

So win or lose Tuesday, Im starting my "Santorum  for President" movement .
 

4).  Speaking of Presidential elections, and I was, expect Hilliary Clinton to announce her candidacy for President 5 seconds after she wins her senatorial re-election in NY.  My prediction is she wont make it thru the primaries.  Its not that America isnt ready for a woman President, its just Hilliary aint the woman for the job.

5).  And finally, but most important.....the election is 4 days away!!!!
For our sakes and the sakes of our children and grandchildren, choose wisely!!!!!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jesus a Democrat?


"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice:but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." Proverbs 29:2

First, let me start off by stating I am a Christian. If this offends you, I make no apologies. I do not have a bumper sticker on my car that says: “WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?” I already know. I have this book at home called the Bible, which tells me what Jesus did and would do. I am a full time Christian, not a part-time Christian. I look at the difference being, a full time Christian views Christianity as an all or nothing proposition. You either embrace the teachings of Christ and the Words of the Bible one hundred percent, or not at all. Part-time Christians believe they can pick and choose which teachings they accept or reject. 
 
  I am a Christian, but also a voter. The paradox is resolved when I stay with my adherence to my beliefs and testament to my faith even into the voting booth. I look at the candidates and their stand on the issues of the day. I take their stand and political rhetoric and match it against what is taught in the Bible, the ultimate litmus test. I know in my heart, nothing will be 100%. So, like everyone else, I look for the closest match.

  I knew it was only a matter of time. No matter how hard they fight it, the Democratic Party knows that President Bush was re-elected on the strength of Christian voters. We know they are desperate and want back in. So how long would it be before they try to present themselves as an acceptable alternative for Christian voters. All they have to do is to try to change our thinking on what are important issues to us. And voila!!!! Along comes former Democratic Congressman Martin Frost who wrote an article for FOXnews.com on Oct. 2, 2006, entitled “New Book Says Religious Right is Wrong About Christian Value" in which he makes the following statement: "Jesus would have been a Democrat had he been alive today. After all, he preached about helping the poor and the peaceful resolution of disputes. ...Jesus had little in common with the current day religious right with its preoccupation with abortion, gay rights and stem cell research."

  To say I was a little amazed at that statement would be an exaggeration. Shoot, I was shell-shocked!!!! He talks about a book written by another liberal Democrat, Bob Edgar, entitled: “Middle Church – Reclaiming the Moral Values of the Faithful Majority from the Religious Right”. Reading Mr. Frost’s article, I came to the conclusion that he had anointed Mr. Edgar as the vision of what a true Christian should be.  True Christians should only be involved with feeding the poor, avoiding war, and protecting the environment. His covert idea is that once Christians subscribe to what he and Mr. Edgar believes are important, the only party that to support would be the Democratic Party. Interesting theory Mr. Frost. To bad you and your party just don’t get it!!! Here are my bullet arguments why Christ would not have been a Democrat:

  • He would have not supported any political party (John 18:36 "...My Kingdom is not of this world"...)
  • He would not have supported any persons or groups that advocated abortion or embryonic stem cell research(Matthew 18:6 "...But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged around his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea"...)
  • He would have never supported same sex marriage (Matthew 19: 4-6 "...Have ye not read that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female....For this cause shall a man leave Father and Mother and shall cleave to his wife:and they twain shall be one flesh?...)
  • He would have railed against the immorality that permeates every fabric of our society today (Matthew 19:8, Mark 10: 5-12, and Luke 16:18)

   Sorry Mr. Frost, the evidence doesnt add up to Jesus being a Democrat, does it?
   
  There is so more to being a Christian than just helping the poor, avoiding war, and saving the environment. Every major religion supports those themes whether it is the Torah or the Quran or even Eastern religions. Even atheists and secularists preach these same ideas. So what does the Democratic Party have to do to entice true Christians to their party?

  If the Democratic Party wants to be the party of Christians, it must join in the condemnation of immoral practices it now supports. Therein lays their problem. It would have to condemn the sin of homosexuality, and embrace the Bible's teaching of marriage between man and woman, thus alienating their new found voting base, the gay community. They would have to forsake their position on abortion in the face of outrage of the feminists. It would have to condemn the vulgarity and promiscuity that is part of Hollywood and the entertainment industry as a whole and risk losing the huge campaign contributions they receive. The Democrats would have to insist that parents be notified when schools are passing out condoms and teaching sex education and same sex partnerships to children. Doing so would cost them the support of the NEA and teacher's unions.

  In short, the Democrats would have to take the road less traveled; the difficult road, the one Christians take every day. The road not based on being safe and non-threatening, but the road outlined in the Bible.

  Can we Christians forget the legacy of the Clinton years? Eight years of having to endure the most amoral person ever to occupy the White House. Yes, we bring up William Jefferson Clinton again. Bill Clinton, liar, adulterer, liar, sexual harasser, liar, philanderer, liar, (did I mention liar?) and if the reports are to be believed, rapist.

  The man who many Democrats, including Mr. Frost, held to high esteem and honor unlike any president before him. They spent eight years humiliating, degrading, and insulting any and all Christians who opposed Clinton. They told us his adultery wasn’t a sin, it was his private life. They spun webs of deceit covering his crimes and misdemeanors. They willfully violated every teaching and every principle in the Bible to support this man. And they did it with a smile on their face. 

  Now they are desperate. They haven’t had control of Congress for 12 years and the White House for 6 years. It is said that absolute power corrupts absolutely, and they are dying to be corrupted again. For some inexplicable reason they believe they now must become the party of the Christian faith. But to do that they insist that we Christians must abandon all of our principles and let they the Democrats dictate to us what we believe. They want us to keep our beliefs generic and innocuous thereby being acceptable to their other secular supporters. Feed the hungry, support anti-war groups, and worry about the environment. Three ideas designed to offend no one. Talk about wanting your cake and eating it too!!!

  So what are we left with? Can we safely say that the Democratic Party now wants to be the party of the group it has loathed for at least the last 20 years? Can we forget the late seventies and eighties when Democrats were oh so happy to call us conservative Christian kooks? Do they now need us to win? The answer would have to be a resounding yes, as long as they can get us to change our beliefs and priorities. This is unacceptable to us. So sorry Mr. Frost as true Christians we must obey all the Words of the Bible.

  Remembering the shame of those times and listening to Mr. Frost and others of the Democratic Party now try to woo Christian voters into their camp, leaves me very skeptical of their motives. I can only conclude that they are trying whatever it takes to get votes.   When they are elected we'll be put on the shelf and forgotten. We'll be again saddled with part-time Christians making governmental decisions and we'll be told that it’s not a question of morality, but what's best for the public good.

Does give you thoughts to ponder............

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »